c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from April, 2009

  • Why Blog Search Sucks

    mike manuel 4:58 pm on November 15, 2005 | 4 Permalink

    Randy Charles Morin at The RSS Blog explains the State of Blogosphere Search or put another way, Why Blog Search Sucks:

    “It’s been awhile since I reported on blogosophere search. This is mostly because it’s not getting any better, with a few exceptions. The problems mainly arise from the broken blogosphere ping infrastructure and the unyielding supply of splogs.”

    Like a lot of folks I have a chip in the game, both personally through this blog but also professionally through my day job consulting clients on their online programs.  The current state of blogosphere search is *painful* to say the least.  We need better tools and services to find and track online conversations.  Enough said.

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

     
  • MSN Search Wiki

    mike manuel 11:13 pm on December 22, 2004 | 0 Permalink

    On the heals of its MSN Weblog launch, the good folks in Redmond now say they have a wiki too.

    We started the blog to be able to talk to you, our users, and it has been a great success. We have decided to create the MSN Search wiki to add a way for you to talk to us (in addition to your blogs, Webmaster World & our Newsgroup). We will be paying attention find out what we are doing right and what we are doing wrong. Tell us! The MSN Search wiki is a part of Channel9 so you will need a log-in to edit it (anyone can read it).

     
  • Yahoo Bringing Search to the Desktop

    mike manuel 2:00 am on December 10, 2004 | 3 Permalink

    The search wars continue, although now the battle’s for the desktop.  Yahoo has officially announced its plans for a new desktop search product by early next year.  They’re teaming up with X1 — which in and of itself leads me to believe this product will kick major arse.

     
  • Google Picks PR Firm

    mike manuel 5:23 pm on December 3, 2004 | 0 Permalink

    I guess the rumors weren’t off
    base after all – O’Dwyer’s (sub req’d) reports today that Google has brought in LA-based
    CarryOn Communications to handle PR for its enterprise unit.

    “CarryOn VP Sarah Evans told
    O’Dwyer’s the firm is handling PR for the enterprise unit as one of the
    company’s first outside agencies.”

    It’s probably considered a smaller piece of
    Google’s overall search business, but a move that nonetheless signals a shift in the company’s all-in-house marketing strategy.

    [Via Jeremy
    Pepper
    ]

     
  • Google Seeking Ad Firm, PR Firm Next?

    mike manuel 6:13 pm on November 29, 2004 | 0 Permalink

    Advertising Age reports that Google’s considering departing from its all-in-house marketing strategy and is in talks now with a few large ad firms.  If this is true, I suppose it’s not that big of a stretch to think they might be considering PR firms too.  The guys at SiliconBeat posted this excerpt from the November issue today:

    "Just three months after going public, Google has been talking with a
    few large general advertising agencies, several industry executives
    have confirmed. A Google representative declined to comment on whether
    the company is conducting a review. Hiring a traditional ad firm would
    indicate a major break with Google’s past methods of brand development.
    In lieu of advertising, the company relied on word-of-mouth brand
    development and the strengths of its search engine. But bringing in
    either a hot creative shop or a large network with global reach would
    likely lead to bigger media buys."

    Update: John Battelle puts the rumors to bed: "I lobbed a call into some folks I know over at Google, and they
    confirm, this report is off base. Yes, Google talks to agencies now and
    again, and yes they use them for relatively minor stuff like placing
    B2B stuff in support of AdSense and the like, but no, there is no major
    review for a branding campaign."

    [More via Andy Beal, Church Marketing Sucks]

     
  • Anatomy of the MSN Search Blog

    mike manuel 10:34 pm on November 15, 2004 | 1 Permalink

    Some interesting things taking shape at Microsoft these days – most notably its MSN Search Blog.  Is anyone else following this stuff?

    After the rather anti-climatic debut of its new search service last week (see “MSN Search’s Beta Blunder”), the MSN Search Blog has been a vehicle for crisis communication and controlled leaks in the span of five days and eight posts.

    Bear with me on this:

    Nov. 11 @ 2:49 a.m. PTMSN Search Service Beta Now Available – the service is officially unveiled

    Nov. 11 @ 1:35 p.m. PTMSN Search Beta Availability Update – this is where things start getting interesting.  The service has only been up and available for a little over ten hours but already people everywhere are reporting problems and industry bloggers are taking jabs.  IMO, there are three interesting points to call out in this particular post:

    • First, the Firefox incompatibility comment is hard to swallow.  You’d think that a key learning coming out of its much hyped “Search Champs” event is that early adopters don’t use Internet Explorer.  And early adopters are exactly who MSN should have been appealing to with this new beta service;
    • Second, props to the MSN folks for providing people with an outlet for offering feedback; and
    • Lastly, it’s interesting to think about “how” this sort of thing might have been communicated had the blog not existed.  Perhaps a press release?  Maybe a statement on the website?  Media call downs?  Probably a combination of these tactics, however, in this scenario MSN would have had some WaggEd flack billing $150+ per hour to accomplish the same thing that took 10 mins via a blog post and achieved arguably the same level of exposure.

    Nov. 12 @ 2:42 p.m. PTMSN Bombs & Rumors – On day two controversy surrounding MSN’s algorithm has the search for ‘more evil than satan’ returning Google as the first result.  This was later fixed.  Props again to MSN for having the foresight and wherewithal to use its new blog as a way to diffuse the rumor mill and address the issue(s) head-on.  And once more, you have to wonder, would this have been communicated as effectively and/or as efficiently via other PR mediums?

    Nov. 12 @ 8:33 p.m. PT
    How We’re Doing – Well, the easy answer here is “not good,” but you have to at very least respect the fact that MSN’s demonstrating a willingness to listen and take the good with the bad – even if sentiment is disproportionately negative.

    Nov. 15 @ 1:02 a.m. PTDesktop Search – Have you ever been to a basketball game and the ref makes a really bad call?  The crowd starts shouting Bull Sh_t, Bull Sh_t, Bull Sh_t in unison.  Right, that was the entire search industry today.  Seriously, everyone knows MSN is working on a desktop search product, but the fact that they decided to publicly paint this post as an “unauthorized disclosure” is laughable.  This post did, however, demonstrate MSN’s willingness to take some risks and share inside information and that’s what will ultimately keep folks coming back for more.

    All this being said, we now officially have the three largest Web search companies mixing it up online via their blogs (see Google, Yahoo).  It’s an interesting corner of the tech industry – one I’ll personally be following closely as things continue to unfold.